Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu: Strategy for Gaza is Increased Warfare

Benjamin Netanyahu's strategy for Gaza underlines a shift towards intensified military actions. As Israel's leader, he has implemented policies focusing on robust responses to security threats, particularly from Gaza-based militants. Netanyahu's approach involves a proactive stance aimed at enhancing deterrence and protecting Israeli citizens, reflecting a broader strategy of maintaining security amid ongoing regional challenges. His leadership emphasizes decisive measures to address threats originating from the Gaza Strip, shaping Israel's defensive and offensive tactics in the region.

Benjamin Netanyahu has devised a strategy for the conflict in Gaza, which pledges his nation to an indefinite period of fighting. There is also the looming possibility of a second-front operation in Lebanon, which poses a significant risk of disaster for Israel.

Benjamin Netanyahu rejected the terms of a US-mediated and United Nations Security Council-approved cease-fire proposal for Gaza.

Boston Brand Media brings you the news - Essentially it's presently clear: Benjamin Netanyahu has a plan for the war in Gaza that commits his country to a conflict that will last forever.

That seems to be the only logical conclusion that can be drawn from the Sunday television interview that Israel's prime minister gave to Channel 14, which was both concerning and informative. Netanyahu said he was ready to open a second front against Hezbollah in Lebanon in his first meeting with domestic media since Hamas carried out its terrorist attack more than eight months ago. He also rejected the terms of a cease-fire proposal for Gaza that was mediated by the United States and approved by the United Nations Security Council.

This does not negate the fact that Israel must make extremely difficult decisions or absolve Hamas of primary responsibility for the disaster it has caused for Gaza's Palestinians since October 7. However, it is becoming increasingly difficult to refute claims made by critics in Israel that Netanyahu requires the war to prevent right-wingers from overthrowing his government and subjecting him to personal retribution for the security flaws. Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza, agrees that the war must continue. He accepts — accurately — that it fills his need of debilitating and at last annihilating Israel.

Netanyahu told journalists the concentrated period of the conflict in Gaza would slow down "soon," giving way to another stage in which Israel held security control in the strip, while "cutting" Hamas' leftover powers at whatever point essential. He additionally said Israel would move liability regarding non military personnel organization to unknown Palestinians (however not the Palestinian Power), supported by nations from the locale.

Simultaneously, be that as it may, Netanyahu precluded any way to a Palestinian state and said he'd acknowledge just a transitory truce to get the arrival of prisoners actually held by Hamas, after which battling should continue. Since then, it appears that the prime minister's office has reversed its position, stating that Israel remained committed to the US-led peace proposal, which aims to end hostilities for good even if the process is broken up into stages. Israel's Middle Easterner neighbors, in the mean time, have clarified they would engage in post-war Gaza just with a super durable truce and guide to Palestinian statehood set up.

To put it another way, Netanyahu's strategy only includes a long-term military occupation of Gaza. When you add in the explosive situation in the West Bank, where hardliners in Israel's cabinet have cut off funds to the Palestinian Authority and backed Jewish settlers' activities, the prospects for any kind of settlement are even worse.

The statement made by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that he would move troops freed from the war in Gaza to Israel's northern border with Lebanon is the most concerning for the still-young state of Israel. He stated that Israel would fight on multiple fronts if necessary to stop Hezbollah from firing the rockets and missiles that have forced Israeli towns and villages along the border to evacuate.

Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of Hezbollah, made the clear threat last week that a war with "no restraint, no rules, and no ceilings" would ensue if Israeli forces invaded. That seems more and more likely.

All of this goes against the fundamental goals of the US administration, which are to put an end to the bloodshed in Gaza, which is hurting American interests in the Middle East and President Joe Biden's chances of winning reelection. They also want to avoid escalating into a regional war, which could attract not only Hezbollah but also Iran, which supports Hezbollah. Netanyahu is being aggressive here as well. He repeated his assertions on Sunday that the United States has reduced its arms supplies to Israel, despite officials in Washington strongly refuting this claim.

Boston Brand Media also found that, although the specifics of US arms deliveries are not available to the public, it is evident that Netanyahu is attempting to use the United States as a scapegoat for his own failure to achieve his own unrealistic goal of eliminating Hamas. As many others and I have stated previously, it is possible to degrade Hamas's ability to attempt a second October 7 and to punish it militarily, but nothing can make it disappear without removing all Palestinians from Gaza. That will not be altered by any quantity of weapons.

One month from now, Netanyahu looks set to make his brinksmanship a stride further, tending to the US Congress in the midst of an official political race. Regardless of what Israel's unprecedented political survivor might tell the opposite, this is a forceful and profoundly hardliner move.

Many Israelis who will still be traumatized by October 7 and eager to regain their sense of security will support Netanyahu's uncompromising approach, as he does with so many other things. But that self-assurance turned out to be a hoax. The strategy of Netanyahu runs the risk of escalating the conflict on multiple fronts, isolating potential Arab partners, and permanently harming the bipartisan American support that has ensured Israel's safety for decades.

Hamas will be pleased by this, and Netanyahu's government won't fall apart as a result. Israel, Lebanon, and the Palestinian people stand to lose everything in the long run as a result. Over the course of the weekend, tens of thousands of Israelis staged protests, pleading for the release of all hostages and the holding of early elections to select a government that would be better equipped to steer Israel out of the rut that Hamas and Netanyahu have led it into. They were correct

For questions or comments write to writers@bostonbrandmedia.com

Source: Moneycontrol‍